<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; David Sedaris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canadianbaconbarbie.com/category/david-sedaris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canadianbaconbarbie.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dear Magazine Subscriptions: I&#8217;m Just Not That Into You</title>
		<link>http://canadianbaconbarbie.com/2008/03/dear-magazine-subscriptions-im-just-not-that-into-you/</link>
		<comments>http://canadianbaconbarbie.com/2008/03/dear-magazine-subscriptions-im-just-not-that-into-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David Sedaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek chic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadianbaconbarbie.com/2008/03/dear-magazine-subscriptions-im-just-not-that-into-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Sunday New York Times;
I thought I loved you. Seriously, when we were &#8220;dating,&#8221; before I made the big commitment, I couldn&#8217;t get enough of you. Maybe it was the fact that you played hard to get, appearing only on the mornings when you hadn&#8217;t already been picked up by someone else at the few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sunday New York Times;</p>
<p>I thought I loved you. Seriously, when we were &#8220;dating,&#8221; before I made the big commitment, I couldn&#8217;t get enough of you. Maybe it was the fact that you played hard to get, appearing only on the mornings when you hadn&#8217;t already been picked up by someone else at the few local stores that stocked you. Sometimes I&#8217;d just have to settle for going to the coffee shop on Sunday morning, hoping to see you there in the arms of a stranger.</p>
<p>But now that I have you I mistreat you. I generally ignore you except for a few of your less demanding features&#8211;the &#8220;Modern Love&#8221; column, the magazine, the pictures of New York fashion trends. I read your front page and the week review out of duty. I don&#8217;t always appreciate your intelligence. And I hardly ever tackled your crossword puzzle. Half of your pages (business, sports) go straight to the recycling bin.</p>
<p>Sorry, but I&#8217;m just not that into you.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Dear New Yorker;</p>
<p>We met casually once and it you seemed interesting, if a bit old for me (those cartoons&#8230; really?) But once I subscribed to you you turned into one of those stalker type dates who wouldn&#8217;t leave me alone. Maybe if you only came around once a month I&#8217;d be more interested. But every week you show up on my doorstep, and in the end I just tossed you aside. Unless you had an article by David Sedaris. It wasn&#8217;t enough to keep me around.</p>
<p>Once I rejected you things just got worse. The letters, the e-mails, the last chance bargaining, the ultimatums. I mean come-on. You&#8217;ll just have to face the truth: I&#8217;m just not that into you.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Dear Glamour,</p>
<p>We have an on again, off again relationship.  I just can&#8217;t seem to shake you. You&#8217;ve been in my life since I was a teenager, always there with a word of advice or a fashion tip. When I see you in the grocery store I&#8217;m always happy to see you, and want to pick you up and hold you. But you&#8217;re kind of predictable, and I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ve changed over the last 15 years as much as I have. Everytime you start talking about the best forms of birth control or new skin cleansers or how spring florals are in (again) I just want to tune out. But somehow I&#8217;m a sucker for your do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts. So I guess I&#8217;ll stay with you for now, but really, I&#8217;m just not that into you.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Dear Wired,</p>
<p>You think you&#8217;re so hip, with your flashy colors and shiny pages and articles about tech-y things. But I only brought you here out of mild curiosity, and a free voucher from some air miles I figured I&#8217;d never use anyway. Your attempts to seem cool seem kind of like you are trying to comb over a bald spot. I guess I&#8217;m just not into geek chic. Or you.</p>
<p>***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canadianbaconbarbie.com/2008/03/dear-magazine-subscriptions-im-just-not-that-into-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--f0c25b539901624b460e129d15264305-->